|
A Characterization of the
Aggressive Behavior |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
BACKGROUND Colon cancer is the second most frequently diagnosed cancer in the U.S. Surgery is the most common treatment; however, recurrence after surgery is a huge problem, and death usually occurs after recurrence. Successful treatment of colon cancer is limited to tumors that are localized in the bowel and present only in the primary stage. Currently, chemotherapy is not very effective for cancer that has undergone migration away from the bowel, or entered the metastatic stage.(1) Thus, a study of a different form of treatment is critical for the successful treatment of colon cancer. Platinum and palladium compounds were tested as potential anit-cancer agents. The three malignant colon lines studied were SW-480,
a primary tumor isolated from a 51-year-old Caucasian male; SW-620, a
metastatic tumor isolated from the lymph node of the same individual from
which the SW-480 was extracted; and HCT-15, a primary tumor from a 75-year-old
male. These three cancerous colon cell lines were exposed to the following
nine metal compounds synthesized by Dr. Robert Granger (Professor of Chemistry
at Sweet Briar College) and Yen Nguyen (a 2001 Sweet Briar College graduate):
[Pd(dione)phen Cl2]Cl2, Pd(bipy)Cl4 , Pd(phen)Cl4 , [Pt(dione)2 ](PF6
)2 II, Pd(dione)Cl2 II, Cisplatin, [Pd(dione)bipy Cl2]Cl2, [Pt(dione)phen
Cl2]Cl2. It was determined which compound was the most effective against
each malignant line. The mechanism of action of these compounds is currently unknown and is under investigation. The same compounds were applied to the normal colon cell line CCD-33Co, in order to determine which compound was the safest for the normal cells. A soft agar assay was also performed on the three malignant cell lines. The soft agar simulates human tissue. A comparative study of how many distinct colonies each line produced in the soft agar, as well as a characterization of the aggressive behavior of each line, was performed. Finally, a cell adhesion assay was performed using fluorescence microscopy to analyze the results. Data on a cell type's adhesive qualities provides a quantitative measure of the cell line's invasive properties. In this assay, cells were dyed with calcein stain and photographed. Cells that adhered were then illuminated with ultraviolet light and photographed. The photographs were used to determine which cell line was relatively most adhesive. METHODS Culturing Colon Lines The SW-480 cells were grown in Liebovitz' L15 media with 10% fetal bovine serum in T-25 cm2 flasks. The cells were fed every 2-3 days and were transferred in 1:4 and 1:8 ratios to new flasks once the cells were confluent. The SW-620 cells were grown using the same protocol. The HCT-15 cells were grown in RPMI media with 10% fetal bovine serum in T-25 cm2 flasks. The cells were fed every 3-4 days and transferred in 1:5 and 1:10 ratios to new flasks once the cells were confluent. The CCD-33Co cells were supplemented with DMEM media with 10% fetal bovine serum. To transfer, or pass, the cells to another flask, they were trypsinized to remove them from the original flask. This was done by removing the old media and washing the cells with 5 mL of PBS buffer solution. One milliliter of trypsin was added to the flask, and the cells were allowed to detach from the flask. Four milliliters of media were added to halt the trypsin action. The SW-480 and SW-620 cell lines were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius in a non-CO2 incubator. The HCT-15 and CCD-33Co cell lines were incubated at 37 degrees Celsius in a 5% CO2 incubator. Photographs of malignant and normal colon cells
*All cells were photographed using light microscopy with a 10X lens.
A colorimetric assay that measures the reduction of MTT by mitochondrial succinate dehydrogenase was performed. MTT is absorbed into the cells and into the mitochondria, where it is then reduced to a formazan product.(2) Each cell line (with the exception of CCD-33Co due to time constraints) was exposed to each of the nine compounds three times. To prepare the cells for exposure, they were trypsinized from the flask. The cells were plated in microwell plates. The final concentration of DMSO (dimethyl suloxide) was 1%, and the compound was diluted to 1.0 x 10-5M. The microplate was incubated for 48 hours. The medium was then removed using a vacuum pump, and 100 µL of DMSO was added to each well to lyse the cell membranes and dissolve the blue formazan. The plates were placed on a mixer for 5 minutes and then were inserted into a Tecan Spectra Reader. The percent survival was determined using Microsoft WinSelect and Excel. Soft Agar Assay To make the base layer, a 3% agar stock was made in PBS and sterilized in the autoclave. At 45 degrees Celsius, 80 mL of the medium were mixed with 20 mL of the 3% agar. Five milliliters per plate of this solution were aliquoted and allowed to solidify. To make the cell layer, the cells were counted using trypan blue dye and a hemacytometer. The cell concentration was adjusted to 1 x 106 cells/mL. The cells were resuspended in separate tubes, in which 6.5 mL of agar medium were mixed with 2.7 mL of cells. One- and-a-half milliliters of cell-agar mixture were dispensed on top of the base layer. The plates were then incubated for 2 1/2 weeks. Five plates for each cell line were used. The colonies each cell line produced were counted. (This is explained in more detail in the discussion of results below.) Cell Adhesion Assay First, a monolayer was made to provide a layer to which test cells might adhere. The volume needed for the monolayer was determined as follows: each chamber was measured to be approximately 3 cm2. Since the T-25 cm2 flasks were used for culturing the cells, and these flasks allow for 75 cm2 of cells at a 1:3 ratio, it was determined that one T-25 flask could seed six 4-chambered slides. The cells were trypsinized and brought to a 24-mL volume. One milliliter of cell/media solution was added to each chamber and incubated. The top layer was then prepared. The cells were trypsinized and transferred to polypropylene tubes. Five milliliters of media were added. The cells were washed twice with PBS and resuspended in serum-free RPMI media at 5 x106 cells/mL. To get this concentration, cells were counted using the hemacytometer, and the concentration was adjusted accordingly. Five microliters of calcein AM (Molecular Probes) per milliliter of cell suspension were added. The cells were then incubated at 37 degrees Celsius for 30 minutes. Next, the cells were washed with pre-warmed RPMI media and re-suspended in RPMI media at 5 x 106 cells/mL, and 100 µL of the calcein-labeled cell suspension was added to the chambers. The slides were incubated for 2 hours. The non-adherent cells were then removed by adding pre-warmed RPMI media to each chamber. The chamber was swirled gently and then inverted onto a paper towel. This process was performed four times. After the fourth washing, 200 µL of PBS were added to each chamber. Fluorescence microscopy, or exposing the cells to ultraviolet light, was used to photograph the emissions, and the amount of fluorescent cells shown for each cell line was compared. To determine the cells' viability, a portion of the non-calcein-stained cells were dyed with trypan blue and counted with a hemacytometer. RESULTS Exposure of Cell Lines to Compounds
Soft Agar Assay Table 1
*All cell lines produced a layer of small colonies. Only larger aggregations of cells were considered significant colonies. Colonies were counted from 5 plates for each cell line. DISCUSSION OF RESULTS It is important to note that the overall cell survival percentages for the malignant cell lines were relatively high. The overall rate of stability of the compounds tested was not known. The age of the compounds did not exceed two weeks when applied. From the data it is clear that the stability of the compounds declined rapidly within a two-week period. In future studies, compounds will be dissolved the day of application. However, the effectiveness of a compound relative to the others tested can be determined without considering the actual percentage of cell survival the compound yielded. The survival rate for the SW-480 cell line shows that Pd(dione)Cl2 II was the most effective compound and was 70% more effective than [Pd(dione)bipy Cl2]Cl2, the least effective compound. Pd(bipy)Cl4 was the second most effective compound and approximately 30% less effective than Pd(dione)Cl2 II. Against the SW-620 cell line, Pd(dione)Cl2 II was also the most effective compound and Pt(dione)3(PF6)4 was the least effective: 80% less effective than Pd(dione)Cl2 II. The compound Pt(dione)2(PF6)2 II was second most effective and approximately 19% less effective than Pd(dione)Cl2 II. Surprisingly, [Pd(dione)bipy Cl2]Cl2 was most effective against the HCT-15 cell line and 55% more effective than the least-effective Cisplatin. Pd(phen)Cl4 was the second most effective compound and 11% less effective than [Pd(dione)bipy Cl2]Cl2. The compound Pd(dione)Cl2 II was approximately 10% more effective against the SW-480 cell line than was Pd(dione)Cl2 II against the SW-620 cell line and [Pd(dione)bipy Cl2]Cl2 against the HCT-15 cell line. Against CCD-33Co, the normal colon cell line, Cisplatin was least toxic, yielding a 108.5% cell survival. Pd(dione)Cl2 II was most toxic, resulting in a 63% cell survival. [Pd(dione)bipy Cl2]Cl2 was the second most toxic compound, producing a survival rate of 63.5%. Pd(bipy)Cl4 was the second least toxic compound. In the soft agar assay, the HCT-15 cell line produced the most colonies and the SW-620 cell line produced the fewest. These results were surprising, because SW-620 is a metastatic tumor. Thus, it would be expected that this cell line would be more invasive than the primary tumor, SW-480, and would produce more migrating colonies. In the cell adhesion assay, in the fields viewed, it is clear that the HCT-15 cell line had the greatest concentration of adherent cells. The SW-480 cell line had the lowest concentration of adherent cells. These results show that the primary tumor cells, SW-480, are less adhesive than the metastatic cells, SW-620. The results also show that the HCT-15 line, hypothesized to be a more aggressive line than SW-620, has the most adherent cells. CONCLUSION Pd(dione)Cl2 II and [Pd(dione)bipy Cl2]Cl2 are ideal candidates for further testing. Of the nine compounds tested, these two were most effective against the colon cancer. Unfortunately, however, these were also the compounds most toxic against the normal colon cells. Thus, a correlation between the composition and structure of the compound and the mechanism of uptake must be researched. It is evident that the two compounds mentioned were most effective against the primary colon tumor and not as effective against the metastatic tumors. From the soft agar assay, the HCT-15 cell line, thought to be the most aggressive line, produced the most colonies. From the cell adhesion assay, it is clear that the aggressive HCT-15 cell line contained the largest concentration of adherent cells, SW-620 the second largest, and the primary SW-480 the lowest. So, it was concluded that a correlation between the stage of the colon cancer and the level of aggressiveness of the cancer cells had been established. The primary tumor demonstrated less aggressive patterns of behavior: SW-480 was most responsive to the metal compound treatment, formed the fewest colonies in the soft agar, and displayed the least amount of adherent cells with in the cell adhesion assay. FURTHER RESEARCH I would like to run more MTT assays of these lines exposed to the compounds, particularly to the compounds Pd(dione)Cl2 II and [Pd(dione)bipy Cl2]Cl2. With all exposures, the compounds used will be fresh dilutions to avoid discrepancies due to instability. More soft agar assays will need to be performed to establish a definite pattern between the cell lines and the invasive behavior. More importantly, I would like to use Electron Microscopy to photograph the cell surfaces in the malignant and normal cell lines before and after exposure to the compounds. This information would possibly assist in understanding the varying levels of effectiveness of the compounds on the different cell lines, particularly between the primary and metastatic tumors. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
References Cancer Collaborative Group, Colorectal. "Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review." Lancet. 2000; 356 (9234): 968-974. Cooper, Geoffrey. Elements of Human Cancer. 1992. Jones and Barlett Publishers, Inc. p.22-26, 296-297
return to table of contents |